How many stores can be opened under a single RFC tax ID for a local store on Meike Duo Mexico? Many clients at Qicaiying have asked this question. Instead of searching for information online, I recommend reading this article. I’ll explain Mercado Libre’s actual criteria for determining store associations—not based on hearsay, but on platform rules and real-world operational experience.

I’m sure there are business owners on MeKeDuo who have encountered this situation: their RFC tax ID has been frozen, leaving them feeling helpless and unsure of how to proceed. This article will walk you through the ins and outs of Mexican tax IDs. A-Jie (a pseudonym) had been operating his local Mexican store for over half a year, and everything was going smoothly. One day, he logged into his Mercadillo dashboard and discovered that his tax status had changed from “RFC Verified” to “RFC Pending Verification.” He didn’t think much of it, assuming the system was conducting a routine review.

Two days later, he discovered that the settlement amounts for the new orders were incorrect—36% had been deducted as tax from each order, instead of the previous amount of approximately 10.5%. Only then did he start to panic.

When I contacted Meike Duo customer service, I received the following response: “Your RFC tax ID status is shown as ‘Suspendido’ (suspended), and the platform has automatically switched to the non-resident withholding tax rate. Please contact SAT to restore your tax ID status.”

On August 17, 2026, the withholding module of the Electronic Tax Bureau for Individuals quietly rolled out a major update—a permanent pop-up alert and blocking mechanism for income information related to ”zero declarations for three consecutive months” of wages and salaries. This means that the system now strictly blocks the practice of ”routine zero reporting” for former employees or during periods of inactivity—a practice that was previously common among businesses. This is not just an ordinary feature upgrade, but the first substantive implementation of the ”data linkage and preemptive risk control” principles from the Golden Tax Phase IV initiative in the individual income tax sector. As soon as the news broke, finance groups across the country were abuzz with questions: How exactly should companies handle consecutive zero-declarations? What about former employees who haven’t filed zero declarations?

In August 2026, a document titled ”Guidelines for Tax Audits in the Second Half of 2026” drew significant attention in financial and tax circles. The document clearly states that from August through December 2026, the overarching approach to tax audits nationwide will be ”data-driven tax administration, multi-agency joint audits, and end-to-end verification.” Data from six departments—tax, police, banking, customs, medical insurance, and market regulation—has been fully integrated. Random spot checks have been replaced by targeted, industry-specific crackdowns. Four major categories of tax-related violations—fraudulent invoicing, off-the-books income, improper use of tax incentives, and concealment of funds—have been designated as the top priorities for enforcement throughout the year. More importantly, Phase IV of the Golden Tax Project has shifted the focus of oversight from ”auditing accounts” to “auditing individuals”—

In August 2026, with the implementation of the ”Guidelines for Tax Audits in the Second Half of 2026,” a regulatory change that had been overlooked by many companies came to light—pre-dissolution tax compliance screening has become strictly enforced across the board. The previous practice of companies ”walking away” through the simplified dissolution procedure is now being completely shut down. According to the latest audit guidelines, a tax risk screening must be completed prior to simplified deregistration. Companies that conceal inventory, accounts receivable, or unreported revenue cannot proceed directly with deregistration, and all outstanding issues must be traced back and settled in full. This means that deregistration is no longer an ”escape route” for tax issues; rather, it may become a “trigger point” for tax risks.